ArticlePsychiatric research and clinical practice2026
Developing a Natural Language Processing Strategy to Avoid Biased Data in Electronic Health Record Suicide Risk Modeling.
Article in Psychiatric research and clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Pretrained Large Language Models for Suicide Risk Prediction from Clinical Notes in U.S. Veterans.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Personalizing Suicide Risk Assessment: Machine Learning Extraction of Cross-Modal Interactions Between Psychosocial and Demographic Factors in Veterans.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Developing a Natural Language Processing Strategy to Avoid Biased Data in Electronic Health Record Suicide Risk Modeling.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data is increasingly used to enhance suicide risk modeling. Unfortunately, EHR reported death dates are frequently inaccurate. Including EHR data from after patients' deaths, or after suicidal actions which led to their deaths, potentially biases suicide prediction models. In contrast to prior methods which withheld all data from 5-day before reported death, this study investigates using natural language processing to improve the accuracy of detecting EHR reported death dates. Methods: We selected all Veterans Affairs patients who died by suicide with EHR data during 5-day before reported death date ( Results: In the full corpus, we identified 1742 texts entered on reported death date, 274 texts after death date, and 1556 texts that did not reference death or suicidal action but were entered chronologically after other texts indicating death. In contrast to the prior method, which excluded all interval texts, our derived approach retained 60.9% of interval data. Conclusions: Our approach improved detection of valid EHR data in the interval before patient death. Relevance to clinical practice: This study operationalizes a method to detect immediate pre-mortem EHR data that could contribute to less bias in suicide risk modeling. This utilization can improve risk prediction and in turn bolster prevention services.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.