Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Analysis of Viral Blips Through Week 192 of the DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD Phase 3 Studies of Doravirine-Based Regimens in Adults Living With Previously Untreated HIV-1.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We present a post hoc analysis of viral blips (HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL between 2 values of <50 copies/mL) in the DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD doravirine (DOR) Phase 3 studies. Methods: Adults living with untreated HIV-1 were randomized (1:1) to a DOR-containing regimen or comparator (darunavir/ritonavir- or efavirenz-containing), each with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors, for 96 weeks (double-blind base), followed by 96 weeks of a DOR-containing regimen (open-label extension). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze relationships between frequency of blips, baseline characteristics, and virologic rebound (2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL). Results: In the base studies, blips occurred in 11.1%-11.9% of participants who received DOR and 12.1%-15.4% who received comparator. In the extensions, blips occurred in 5.5%-7.9% of participants. Baseline HIV-1 RNA ≤100 000 copies/mL was associated with lower likelihood of blips in the base studies (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; [95% CI, 0.29-0.58]) and in participants who continued DOR in the extensions (0.41 [0.19-0.87]). Baseline CD4+ T-cell count ≤200 cells/mm Conclusions: Blips were associated with increased risk of virologic rebound during the base study, and blips were less likely in participants with lower baseline HIV-1 RNA. Doravirine and comparator groups had similar rates of viral blips.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.