ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2026
Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung transplantation: Its effects on pulmonary function, physical fitness, and quality of life.
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive therapy for patients with end-stage lung disease and improves survival. However, many recipients continue to experience exercise intolerance, reduced physical capacity, and limitations in daily activities despite improved postoperative lung function. These impairments are multifactorial and closely associated with quality of life (QoL) and long-term outcomes. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary intervention aimed at improving exercise capacity, physical fitness, and QoL and has demonstrated benefits across various chronic lung diseases. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on PR in LTx recipients. A literature review was conducted to summarize PR program characteristics, safety, and reported outcomes across lung function, functional capacity, muscle fitness, activity and participation, and QoL, considering heterogeneity in study design and intervention protocols. Across the reviewed studies, PR participation was consistently associated with improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, functional capacity, and QoL. In contrast, changes in spirometric parameters were generally modest. Functional improvements appear to be largely mediated by peripheral adaptations, including enhanced oxygen utilization and neuromuscular performance. These findings highlight the potential role of PR as an important component of short- and long-term management in LTx recipients, particularly during pre-transplant conditioning and post-transplant functional recovery phases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.