Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281851›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of transplantation2026

Picturing better outcomes: Illustrated educational booklets improve patient-reported outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization in abdominal transplantation.

Marissa Di Napoli, Haaris Kadri, Danielle Kessler, Gabriella Canty, Katherine Klingenberg, Elizabeth A Pomfret, James J Pomposelli, Thomas Pshak, Rashikh A Choudhury, Trevor L Nydam and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marissa Di NapoliDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Haaris KadriSchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Danielle KesslerDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Gabriella CantySchool of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Katherine KlingenbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Elizabeth A PomfretDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
James J PomposelliDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Thomas PshakDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Rashikh A ChoudhuryDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Trevor L NydamDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Maria Baimas-GeorgeDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient education remains an underdeveloped component of care in abdominal transplantation. Despite the benefits of improved health literacy, most educational materials remain inaccessible to the average patient.

aimTo evaluate the impact of educational booklets on comprehension, anxiety, satisfaction, and healthcare utilization among abdominal transplant recipients and donors.

methodsAn observational, single-center quality improvement study was conducted in transplant recipients and living donors. Patients received booklets during transplant evaluation, preoperative clinic, or hospital admission. Booklets were developed by transplant surgeons and revised with health literacy experts. Postoperative surveys assessed comprehension, satisfaction, anxiety, and feedback. Patient-reported demographic data and post-operative outcomes were collected from the electronic medical record were analyzed.

resultsEighty-three patients completed the survey, of which nine were excluded for duplicate entries. Satisfaction with content was high, with 81% reporting reduced feelings of overwhelm and 74% reporting less fear of surgery. The average recommendation rating was 9.4/10, with frequent praise for illustrations, glossary, and surgical explanations. Postoperative outcomes improved following booklet implementation, with reductions in readmission rates, emergency department visits, and coordinator calls. Compared with historical data, readmissions decreased significantly (12.2%

conclusionIllustrated educational booklets significantly improved patient comprehension, anxiety, and satisfaction, and reduced unplanned care use. Integrating tailored education into routine transplant care enhances patient experiences and outcomes.

Indexed as

Health literacyKidney transplantLiver transplantPatient educationPatient satisfactionPostoperative healthcare utilizationTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42281851
PMCPMC13250782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.