ArticleGeoHealth2026
Assessing Intraurban Variation in Heat-Attributable Health Burden to Inform Local Interventions.
Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extreme heat exposure leads to excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among older adults, but misalignment in the geographic scales of health data and intraurban heat exposure make it challenging to inform local interventions. We introduce an adaptable framework for developing health burden estimates at finer geographic scales by connecting small area analysis (SAA) techniques with an epidemiologic model of heat related health risks in three steps: (a) estimating an exposure response function using individual level cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalizations for adults aged 65 and over; (b) downscaling daily CVD hospitalization incidence rates at the ZCTA-level to census block groups (CBG) using SAA, adjusting for individual- and community-level demographic factors, and (c) linking exposure-response with daily incidence rates to estimate heat-attributable burden at the CBG scale. Using the data for a metropolitan area in the southeastern United States for the summer of 2018, we estimated 1.8 to 22.0 excess hospitalizations per 10,000 people across CBG. We demonstrate the utility of this 3-step approach to help inform localized intervention strategies by classifying neighborhoods as one of four risk groups: Low, Health-driven, Heat-driven, and Dual-channel (driven by both heat and health). In comparison, using coarse-resolution temperature resulted in a significantly smaller heat-attributable health burden with different geographic distribution across the CBGs, highlighting the importance of using appropriately scaled exposure data. The findings from this study can support more effective heat interventions to address heat-health related outcomes, rather than exposure alone.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.