Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281755›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2026

SCRIPT: Stratified clinical risk prediction from pathology reports using large language models.

Chiara M L Loeffler, Nic G Reitsam, Fabian Wolf, Esther H Stueker, Hannah S Muti, Isabella C Wiest, Jakob Nikolas Kather

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chiara M L LoefflerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Nic G ReitsamElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Fabian WolfElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Esther H StuekerElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Hannah S MutiElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Isabella C WiestElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate risk stratification in oncology is essential for guiding treatment decisions, yet current algorithms rely on a narrow set of structured variables, and hence potentially ignore the rich signal in narrative pathology reports. These reports contain nuanced morphological descriptions and expert clinical judgmentThis narrative information remains largely unused in clinical decision-making as it gets lost in "prose" text-based reports. We hypothesized that large language models (LLMs) could extract prognostic information from complete free-text pathology reports and convert it into a binary survival biomarker. Methods: We used the open-weight LLaMA 3.3 70B model to generate risk scores directly from publicly available pathology reports across three gastrointestinal cancer types. The model was prompted to synthesize the complete narrative reports into a binary prognostic score. We evaluated associations between the LLM-generated scores and survival outcomes, including overall survival, progression-free survival, and disease-specific survival. Results: In colorectal cancer, LLM-generated risk scores demonstrated significant prognostic value for overall survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.92-3.97, Conclusion: LLMs can turn narrative pathology reports into a single, independent survival biomarker. This approach leverages routinely available free-text documentation without requiring additional tissue analysis or pathologist workload, providing a deployable method to enhance risk stratification for treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Deep learningGastrointestinal cancerLLMPathology reportsPrognostic biomarker

Identifiers

PMID42281755
PMCPMC13251499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.