ReviewCureus2026
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems and Clinical Outcomes in Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of Emerging Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDSs), including e-cigarettes and vaping, are increasingly used by adults with inflammatory bowel disease, often during smoking cessation or transition from combustible cigarettes, yet their clinical implications remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from inception through December 18, 2025, together with grey literature sources; the search was rerun on April 24, 2026, identifying no additional eligible studies. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data, and risk of bias was assessed using design-appropriate tools. Four observational studies involving 1,869 participants, of whom 178 were ENDS users, met inclusion criteria. In nonoperative settings, a matched case-control study found no association between current e-cigarette use and a composite outcome of biologic initiation or change, hospitalization, or surgery; smaller cohorts were imprecise. In postoperative Crohn's disease, endoscopic recurrence at one year was higher among exclusive e-cigarette users than among nonsmokers, with a directionally elevated but statistically nonsignificant adjusted estimate and higher biochemical activity also observed. Available evidence does not demonstrate a consistent association between current ENDS use and major inflammatory bowel disease outcomes in nonoperative settings, but a possible signal exists for higher postoperative endoscopic recurrence among e-cigarette users. Larger prospective studies with standardized exposure definitions are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.