Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281670›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Efficacy and Safety of Vericiguat in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abdullah Kilic, Ayushi Saxena, Bilal Khan, Rupanshu Rupanshu, Russaal S Mann, Isha Chopra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdullah KilicInternal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Montclair, USA.
Ayushi SaxenaMedicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Bilal KhanHealth Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, CAN.
Rupanshu RupanshuInternal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, St. Martinus University, Willemstad, CUW.
Russaal S MannInternal Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, IND.
Isha ChopraAnesthesia, Government Medical College, Jaipur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with heart failure (HF) experience high rates of hospitalization and death, and outcomes are particularly unfavorable following recent clinical worsening or decompensation. Vericiguat is an oral soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulator that enhances nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling, with potential benefits for vascular tone and myocardial function. With the completion of recent randomized trials, an updated synthesis of the evidence is warranted. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vericiguat across heart failure phenotypes. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials comparing vericiguat with placebo in chronic HF through September 2025. Five eligible trials (12,877 participants) were included. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and first HF hospitalization. Data were pooled using a random-effects risk ratio (RR) model, and prespecified subgroup analysis was performed by HF phenotype: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Among patients with HFrEF (three trials;

Indexed as

cardiologycardiology researchclinical cardiologyheart failureheart failure with preserved ejection fraction (hfpef)hfpefhfrefsoluble guanylate cyclase stimulatorsvericiguat

Identifiers

PMID42281670
PMCPMC13251650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.