ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Spontaneous Expulsion of Rectally Inserted Tramadol Ampoules: An Unusual Case Report of Drug Concealment and Delayed Disclosure.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spontaneous Expulsion of Rectally Inserted Tramadol Ampoules: An Unusual Case Report of Drug Concealment and Delayed Disclosure.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concealment of illicit drug ampoules is an unusual clinical scenario, posing diagnostic and management challenges due to delayed disclosure, drug leakage risk, and retrieval difficulties. We present the case of a 28-year-old male, an intravenous drug user, brought from police custody with complaints of per rectal pain. After initial denial, he admitted to rectal insertion of six tramadol ampoules. Clinical examination and imaging confirmed the presence of foreign bodies in the rectum. While surgical removal was planned, spontaneous expulsion occurred without complications, as verified by postoperative imaging. This case underscores the importance of early suspicion, detailed history-taking, and prompt imaging in suspected rectal foreign bodies. In stable patients, conservative management with laxatives may allow safe natural expulsion, reducing the need for invasive intervention, as in this case; however, this should be seen as a positive outcome rather than a recommended management approach, especially in cases involving fragile drug-containing ampoules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.