ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Intraspecific differences in tolerance to elevated pH and alkalinity in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) inhabiting neutral and alkaline lakes.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize mechanisms of tolerance to elevated pH and carbonate alkalinity in brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans), a fish species with a broad pH habitat range, including highly alkaline waters such as Buffalo Lake (pH 9.2; [HCO3-] 20.0 mmol l-1) in Alberta, Canada. Stickleback from Buffalo Lake and a more pH-neutral, low-alkalinity reference lake (Buck Lake; pH 8.2; [HCO3-] 3.0 mmol l-1) were collected from the wild and acclimated to common conditions (pH 8.0; [HCO3-] 1.7 mmol l-1) for 2 months. Both populations were then exposed to alkaline conditions (pH 9.5; [HCO3-] 22.1 mmol l-1) in the laboratory, resulting in a significant decrease in survival (14% by 7 days of exposure) in Buck Lake fish, but no mortality in Buffalo Lake stickleback. In a 4 day alkaline exposure, no significant differences in nitrogen or ion regulation were observed between populations, but a trend towards reduced whole-body chloride concentration in Buck Lake stickleback suggested potential disruptions in ion and acid-base regulation in this population. In Buck Lake stickleback, genes involved in cellular stress and immune responses were differentially regulated in gill tissue in response to alkaline exposure, while this response was largely absent in Buffalo Lake stickleback. Overall, alkaline tolerance is higher in brook stickleback resident in an alkaline lake compared with those from a neutral lake, but tolerance does not appear to be a function of differences in nitrogen or ion/acid-base regulation. Rather, alkaline-tolerant stickleback mounted a relatively weaker transcriptomic stress response in the gill, which might represent transcriptional dampening that confers increased tolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.