ArticleEcology2026
High phylogenetic turnover magnifies evolutionary relatedness along bacterial primary succession.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current models of microbial primary succession postulate that stochasticity dominates the early stages of soil community assembly, generating phylogenetically random patterns that are lost as abiotic and biotic filters gain relevance. We hypothesized that, under severe environmental stress, abiotic filters may override stochasticity from early successional stages, inducing phylogenetic clustering due to the overrepresentation of stress-tolerant lineages. Clustering may be magnified towards more carbon-rich stages due to intensified biotic interactions based on the overrepresentation of competitive clades. We also hypothesized that different plant life forms, with their contrasting effects on soil conditions, might modulate the phylogenetic patterns across microbial succession. To test these hypotheses, we collected 106 soil samples along plant size gradients of 13 species belonging to 4 life forms (trees, shrubs, perennial grasses, and dwarf shrubs) in seven sites in Mediterranean drylands in SE Spain. Samples in each gradient were taken in open areas (antecedent situation), underneath seedlings, juveniles, and mature plant individuals. In all cases, we detected large levels of phylogenetic clustering across the succession indicating a negligible role of stochasticity. Plant and soil variables drove different processes along the succession: Clustering of shallow-divergent lineages intensified along with plant growth and enrichment in soil organics, whereas clustering of deep-divergent lineages varied across plant life forms based on their effect on soil moisture. During primary succession, phylogenetic turnover increased due to the progressive enrichment in large lineages that were composed of closely related organisms and phylogenetically distant to the initial communities. Our data help fine-tune current models of bacterial primary succession indicating that (1) environmental filters can override stochasticity from the early stages of primary succession and (2) large levels of phylogenetic turnover can concur with increased evolutionary relatedness across gradients of microbial community assembly. Shifts in phylogenetic patterns may critically influence key ecosystem functions, such as decomposition and biogeochemical cycling, driven by soil microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.