Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281333›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in rheumatology2026

Update on IgA nephropathy: implications for treatment in IgA vasculitis: a guide for rheumatologists.

Julia A Ford, Ora Gewurz-Singer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia A FordDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ora Gewurz-Singer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIgA vasculitis (IgAV) and IgA nephropathy (IgAN) have historically been treated as distinct disease entities in clinical practice and in drug development, despite growing evidence speaking to a shared pathogenesis. Recent years have seen an explosion in therapeutic trials in the IgAN space, with multiple approvals of targeted therapies and a shifting paradigm of care; meanwhile, IgAV has lagged behind with a paucity of randomized trials. What can rheumatologists learn from IgAN, and can IgAV patients benefit from therapeutic advances in IgAN? RECENT

findingsIn this article, we will compare and contrast the epidemiology and clinical presentations of IgAV and IgAN, and explore the evidence supporting a shared pathogenesis including the 'four hit hypothesis'. We will review emerging therapies in IgAN and their biologic basis for the rheumatology audience, and discuss how lessons learned in IgAN might be applied to IgAV. SUMMARY: Rheumatologists should be aware of the therapeutic advances in IgAN, which may inform future management of IgAV patients, particularly those with renal involvement.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, IGAIgA VasculitisVasculitisHumanscomplementIgAIgA nephropathyIgA vasculitis

Identifiers

PMID42281333
PMCPMC13566460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.