Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2026
Defining disease stability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence from phase 3 clinical trials.
Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- COPD Stability and Asthma Remission: Different Words for the Same Therapeutic Ambition?Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleDisease stability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a low disease activity state proposed as a treatment target.
objectivesCharacterize COPD stability as a composite endpoint.
methodsPost hoc analyses were carried out on IMPACT and FULFIL (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI] vs dual therapies) and MATINEE/METREX/METREO (mepolizumab added onto triple therapy). Stability was defined as "no moderate/severe exacerbations and no worsening from baseline in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and FEV1." We assessed whether achieving stability at week 28 was prognostic of subsequent outcomes (time to first on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation and time to all-cause mortality [ACM]) after week 28 (IMPACT). Bayesian joint modeling evaluated the probability of achieving stability (IMPACT). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsStability was achieved with FF/UMEC/VI by 22% of patients in IMPACT (week 52) and by 46% of patients in FULFIL (week 24); stability was achieved with mepolizumab + triple therapy by 18% of patients in MATINEE/METREX/METREO (week 52). Patients were more likely to achieve stability with triple vs dual therapy and with mepolizumab vs placebo. Many individuals achieving stability had clinically meaningful improvements in CAT and FEV1. Patients achieving stability at week 28 (vs patients who were not stable) had a 45.7% reduction in the risk of moderate/severe exacerbations and a 51.7% reduction in the risk of ACM after week 28. Bayesian joint modeling demonstrated a mean (SD) posterior probability of stability: 25.60% (0.66) at week 52 (FF/UMEC/VI).
conclusionsOur data provide further evidence for disease stability as an achievable COPD treatment target that predicts long-term clinical benefits in exacerbations and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.