ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Minding the Gap: Complex Relational Trauma Survivors' Experiences Navigating Healthcare.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionComplex relational trauma (CRT) occurs in close relationships where adversity is prolonged, repeated and inescapable. Despite the known connections between CRT and adverse health outcomes, anecdotal reports from survivors indicate that education on CRT is not translating into more effective clinical practice, resulting in substandard and even harmful experiences of healthcare.MethodsUsing a patient-oriented research methodology, we recruited N = 13 participants with CRT from Canada and the United States. The sample was primarily female (N = 9), with a range of ages (20-69 years) and races/ethnicities. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and participated in an individual qualitative healthcare interview. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis using NVivo 15.ResultsIn terms of both mental and medical healthcare, similar themes emerged, including structural and financial barriers to care, experiences of invisibility, invalidation, and re-traumatization, identification of factors that supported safety, trust, and disclosure, as well as a need for specialized understanding of CRT as distinct from PTSD. Meta-themes that emerged included a need for practitioners to better understand the intersection of physical and mental health concerns in persons with CRT, as well as more integrative and holistic care.ConclusionsPeople with CRT report that they are not currently being well served in the healthcare system. Future research should ascertain providers/trainees' knowledge and skill base regarding CRT, which can inform on opportunities for further education. Findings also suggest that survivors would benefit from efforts to address siloed care, which undermines effective pathways to health and well-being in survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.