ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Trends in Medicaid Administrative Expenditures During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundMedicaid administrative spending funds core program operations such as fraud and waste detection and prevention, technological infrastructure, and eligibility determination. Though typically lower than private insurance administrative costs, such spending varies across states and may respond to policy and economic shocks.PurposeThis study examined trends in Medicaid administrative expenditures before and during the federal maintenance of effort (MOE) policy enacted during the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE).MethodsUsing state-level panel data from 2018-2022 for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, we regressed Medicaid administrative spending outcomes (percent changes in dollar amount, per-enrollee, and per capita spending) on a binary indicator for MOE period and controlled for unemployment rates, enrollment changes, and managed care characteristics using linear regression models with state fixed effects. We also estimated models stratified by administrative burden tertiles.ResultsPercent change in Medicaid administrative spending (amount in United States dollars) remained stable during the MOE period relative to pre-MOE years. Per-enrollee administrative spending declined by 9.1 percentage points.ConclusionsDespite record enrollment under MOE policies, Medicaid administrative spending did not significantly increase. The findings suggest that states maintained administrative cost stability, potentially achieving economies of scale, and that administrative burden levels and other time varying state characteristics did not meaningfully influence these trends.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.