ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2026
Substitution Patterns After Discontinuation of CNS-Active Medications in Older Adults in Primary Care.
Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about substitution of alternative medications in the context of deprescribing. The objectives were to: (1) determine the frequency of medication substitutions among those who discontinued a central nervous system (CNS)-active medication, and (2) characterize substitutions as potentially inappropriate (as per the 2023 Beers Criteria) versus not.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis that combined data from the intervention and usual care arms from the STOP-FALLS deprescribing trial that tested a health-system-embedded intervention designed to reduce prescription of CNS-active medications. This analysis focused on participants followed for 360 days following baseline with chronic use of opioids, benzodiazepines, tricyclic antidepressants, skeletal muscle relaxants, or Z-drugs. Discontinuation was defined as the first date when there was no evidence of a prescription fill for 90 days, thus only participants with a discontinuation that occurred in the first 270 days were included. A list of likely alternative treatments was developed for each target medication. A substitution was operationalized as a new alternative medication prescribed during the 30 days prior to or 60 days after discontinuation of a target medication.
resultsThe study sample included 2182 individuals (average age 70.5 years, 63.1% female). At baseline, a total of 2415 target medications were prescribed, of which 442 (18.3%) were discontinued. Discontinuation rates varied from 122 (8.0%) for users of opioids to 86 (49.7%) for users of skeletal muscle relaxants. Substitutions were made for 42 (9.5%) drug discontinuations. Of these substitutions, 11 of 42 (26.2%) were to a potentially inappropriate medication: tricyclic antidepressants (n = 5), benzodiazepines (n = 3) and hydroxyzine (n = 3). Other common substitutions included gabapentin, selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and trazodone. DISCUSSION: Of medication discontinuations with a substitution, one-quarter were to at least one potentially inappropriate medication. This finding highlights the need for additional guidance for prescribers to ensure safe deprescribing of CNS-active medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.