ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2026
Extended-Interval Dosing and Discontinuation of Dupilumab in Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Retrospective Study.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study evaluated the clinical courses and treatment patterns of 81 patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) treated with dupilumab at Hiroshima University Hospital. Patients were categorized into six groups based on their clinical outcomes, including those who continued treatment, achieved remission and discontinued, or discontinued due to adverse effects or insufficient efficacy. Of the 81 patients, 38 (47%) continued treatment throughout the study period, and 16 (20%) achieved remission and discontinued treatment without relapse. Analysis of baseline severity using EASI and TARC levels revealed no significant differences between these groups, suggesting that baseline severity does not predict long-term therapeutic outcomes. Regarding concomitant topical therapy, although the potency of topical corticosteroids (TCS) remained unchanged in most patients, the total dosage was significantly reduced by a mean of 71.3%, reflecting a successful transition to proactive therapy or a reduced affected body surface area. Furthermore, this study investigated the feasibility of extending dupilumab dosing intervals. Nearly half of the patients extended their intervals including every 3 weeks (Q3W), Q4W, and up to Q8W by 6 months without exacerbation. By 12 months, 22 of the 40 evaluable patients successfully transitioned to extended intervals up to Q12W. These findings suggest that baseline disease severity does not necessarily predict the long-term clinical course of dupilumab therapy in patients with AD. Although TCS potency is often maintained to ensure stability, the dosage can be drastically reduced. Furthermore, a subset of patients can discontinue or extend the dosing intervals, and the optimal timing for extending intervals is more flexible and can be initiated earlier than currently suggested by previous reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.