ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2026
Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Peer-Led Neurocognitive Screening for Older Adults Living With HIV at a Community Hospital in Thailand: A Multiple-Methods Study.
Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionNeurocognitive impairment (NCI) is increasingly prevalent among older adults living with HIV (OALHIV). HIV clinics in low- and middle-income countries often do not routinely screen for NCI. Task-shifting screening to peer educators might be an alternative approach. We explored facilitators and barriers to implementing a peer-led NCI screening tool in an HIV clinic in Thailand.
methodsThe study took place at a community hospital HIV clinic in suburban Chiang Mai. Peer educators were trained to screen OALHIV ≥50 years for NCI using the International HIV-Dementia Scale for global cognition, the Trail-Making Test for psychomotor speed and the General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition. We interviewed OALHIV who participated in the peer-led NCI screening during and after a 12-week implementation phase, peer educators and healthcare professionals to identify individual and intervention characteristics categorized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Transcribed and imported digital materials were used for thematic analysis in Dedoose (version 9.2.12).
resultsFrom March to June 2023, 162 eligible OALHIV were recruited. Among the 144 (89%) screened, the median age was 58 (IQR 54-62) years, and 93 (65%) were female. On at least one measure, 40 (28%) matched the study-defined referral criteria for NCI, of whom 20 (50%) were diagnosed with mild NCI, representing 14% of all those screened. We conducted 39 interviews with OALHIV (n = 26) and clinic-based staff (n = 12; five peer educators, eight healthcare professionals). The perceived benefits of neurocognitive screening, the empowerment of peer educators, the reliance on established links between peers and clinic clients, and OALHIV acceptance of screening were facilitators of the intervention. The main reported barriers were a lack of perceived necessity among OALHIV, clinic staff concerns about screening quality and comprehensiveness, and a lack of supportive national policies to integrate screening into routine HIV care for OALHIV.
conclusionsWe demonstrated that a peer-led NCI screening intervention was feasible and acceptable in our setting. Raising awareness of the benefits of NCI screening among OALHIV and improved training and coordination in the healthcare setting would facilitate more effective implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.