ReviewClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
The Dilemma of Providing Advanced Hemophilia Treatments in Developing Countries - For Whom, by Whom and Where?
Review in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia, a congenital deficiency of factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B), leads to recurrent bleeding episodes that may cause progressive joint damage and long-term disability. Traditional management relies on intravenous factor replacement therapy; however, limited half-life, immunogenicity, venous access challenges, and the burden of frequent infusions have prompted the development of extended half-life (EHL) factor products. Although EHL therapies represent an important advancement, they only partially reduce treatment burden and do not fully meet expectations for improved convenience and sustained bleed protection. Recent innovations are reshaping the therapeutic landscape. Nonfactor subcutaneous therapies such as anti-TFPI molecules, antithrombin reducing agents, and anti-protein C agents offer simplified administration with the potential for improved adherence. Gene therapy provides the prospect of a long-term therapeutic effect in selected patients. In Türkiye, hemophilia care remains largely factor-based; however, clinical trial participation and recent regulatory approvals for selected novel therapies have begun to expand real-world experience with these emerging treatment options. As global practice shifts toward individualized, less invasive treatment approaches, expanding availability of novel therapies and optimizing patient-specific treatment strategies will be essential. This review examines current and evolving treatment options, key challenges, and future opportunities shaping the trajectory of hemophilia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.