ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Application of Artificial Intelligence to an Impact-Based Analysis Method to Estimate the Soft Tissue Phantom Stiffness: A Proof-of-Concept.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Assessing the biomechanical properties of soft tissues can be useful because they are related to their pathophysiological state. This study explores the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to an Impact-Based Analysis Method (IBAM) to predict the mechanical properties of soft tissues. 40 agar-based soft tissue phantoms with different stiffness were prepared. For each phantom, Young's modulus was estimated using dynamic mechanical analysis and IBAM measurements were performed. Various AI-based models were applied to the results obtained with the IBAM approach to predict Young's modulus. Principal component analysis shows that three parameters can explain 85% of the variation in IBAM data. The times of the different maxima of the force signal peaks are significantly correlated with Young's modulus (R2 = 0.99). Most AI-based models allow a decrease in the prediction error compared to the standard IBAM approach (from 5.4% down to 1.2%). Decision trees and ensemble stacking, as well as convolutional neural networks, show a decrease in the prediction error of 74% and 50%, respectively. Applying AI approaches within the IBAM framework is a powerful approach to identify Young's modulus of soft tissues. This study paves the way for using AI-based methods to characterize superficial soft tissue biomechanical properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.