Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281069›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Recent Advancements in Digital Management and Monitoring of Mine Waste: Sensors, Characterization, and Predictive Modeling-A Review.

Tianqi Li, Feven Desta, Mike Buxton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianqi LiGeoscience and Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0005-1454-9058
Feven DestaGeoscience and Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8765-6170
Mike BuxtonGeoscience and Engineering Department, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1783-7566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mining activities generate substantial volumes of solid waste materials during exploration and processing. These residuals pose environmental and geotechnical concerns due to their large spatial footprints and associated risks but may also contain potentially valuable resources. These characteristics highlight the necessity and opportunity of effective management and monitoring strategies. In recent years, a diverse range of technologies and methods have been applied to characterize mine waste compositions and analyze their spatial-temporal variability. These include remote sensing systems, ground-based sensors, and advanced data-driven methods. Despite the rapid advancement, the existing literature provides limited insight into the critical evaluation of how these techniques are applied in practice. This review systematically examines peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2021 and 2024 to highlight the state of the art in characterization, modeling, and monitoring techniques for mine waste. The review identifies recent trends, key gaps, advantages, and limitations of these techniques. The summary suggests that mining companies and research communities are increasingly adopting innovative technologies, transitioning from conventional methods to more sustainable practices. However, it also reveals ongoing challenges and persistent limitations. Further efforts, such as real-time monitoring capabilities, are required to achieve full implementation and integration across the industry and academia.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecharacterizationmine waste monitoringmodelingsensors

Identifiers

PMID42281069
PMCPMC13258823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.