ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sensing the Action: Rethinking Sensor Modalities and Multi-Modal Fusion in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulation.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Recent Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have rapidly emerged as general-purpose robotic policies that integrate language understanding, visual perception, and robot control. However, prior studies and surveys have primarily emphasized backbone architectures, action decoders, training recipes, and benchmark performance, whereas relatively limited systematic attention has been given to sensor modality selection, heterogeneous signal alignment and fusion, and their connection to action generation, all of which are critical to the performance and safety of real-world robotic manipulation. This survey addresses this gap by reinterpreting VLA within the framework of a sensor-fusion-action pipeline. This study first presents a systematic taxonomy of major sensor modalities, including RGB, depth, tactile sensing, force/torque, proprioception and inertial measurement unit, multi-spectral/thermal, and event-based vision, and compares them in terms of the physical information they provide, their characteristic failure modes, and their deployment constraints. This survey further reviews teleoperation-, human video-, and simulation-based data collection pipelines, together with representative dataset configurations, and analyzes the multi-modal design space from a sensor-centric perspective, including early and late fusion, cross-attention, token-level fusion, adapters, mixture of experts, and multi-rate action representations. In addition, this study identifies a strong bias in existing benchmarks toward RGB-centric inputs and single success-rate metrics and emphasizes the need for a multidimensional evaluation framework incorporating robustness, worst-case performance, safety, latency, and efficiency. By shifting the focus away from a model-centric narrative and explicitly accounting for real-world sensor complexity, this survey seeks to establish a sensor-centered foundation for the next generation of Physical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.