Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281060›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Comparative Analysis of Additional Measurement Error Introduced by Inductive Current Transformers, Rogowski Coils and Electronic Current Transducer for Harmonics of Distorted Current.

Michal Kaczmarek, Michal Ozimek, Jerzy Cal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal KaczmarekInstitute of Mechatronics and Information Systems, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6518-9161
Michal OzimekInstitute of Mechatronics and Information Systems, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.
Jerzy CalInstitute of Mechatronics and Information Systems, Lodz University of Technology, 90-537 Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0009-0000-8697-177X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates the accuracy of conventional inductive current transformers (iCTs) and Rogowski coils (RCs) in measuring distorted currents, evaluating compliance with the WB0 (up to the 13th harmonic) and WB1 (up to the 60th harmonic) accuracy classes according to the IEC 61869-1 standard. A custom reference iCT, calibrated via the ampere-turns method to achieve a superior baseline accuracy (0.02%), served as the primary benchmark. A zero-flux electronic transducer was utilized strictly to verify this reference. Despite inherent core nonlinearity, tested conventional iCTs with reduced to minimum secondary burdens successfully met the class 0.5-WB1 requirements. In the case of tested Rogowski coils, the study reveals that their wideband performance depends on physical design of the particular type. High-sensitivity coils suffer from increased parasitic capacitance and self-inductance, causing significant additional phase shift at higher frequencies, whereas low-sensitivity, small-diameter coils offer superior linearity. Overall, the tested RCs generally ensured compliance with the 0.5-WB1 class across the evaluated frequency range, with certain units successfully achieving the more restrictive 0.2-WB1 class. Ultimately, conventional iCTs remain a highly reliable solution for metering purposes in low-voltage networks, while properly selected Rogowski coils provide a valuable alternative for power quality analysis and harmonic distortion measurements.

Indexed as

conversion accuracyconversion errorcurrent distortioncurrent errorhigher harmonicIEC 61869-1inductive current transformeroptional wideband accuracy classesphase displacementphase shiftRogowski coiltransformation accuracyWB0WB1

Identifiers

PMID42281060
PMCPMC13259418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.