Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42281047›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Using Heart Rate to Measure Stress in Healthcare Workers Wearing PAPRs and N95 Masks: Insights from a Randomized Trial.

Rodrigo M A Almeida, Rafael Rocha Maciel, Carlos Henrique Valério Moraes, Caroline Lopes Ciofi-Silva, Naila A Oliveira, Giulia M Mainardi, Luciana Cordeiro, Anna Sara Shafferman Levin, Amy I Price, Ying Ling Lin and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rodrigo M A AlmeidaInstitute of Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Federal University of Itajubá-UNIFEI, Itajubá 37500-903, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2663-5464
Rafael Rocha MacielInstitute of Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Federal University of Itajubá-UNIFEI, Itajubá 37500-903, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-5990-851X
Carlos Henrique Valério MoraesInstitute of Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Federal University of Itajubá-UNIFEI, Itajubá 37500-903, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1361-2754
Caroline Lopes Ciofi-SilvaSchool of Nursing, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Campinas 13083-887, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-7255
Naila A OliveiraSão Leopoldo Mandic Medical School, Araras 13600-001, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8340-5334
Giulia M MainardiSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.
Luciana CordeiroSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.
Anna Sara Shafferman LevinSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.
Amy I PriceDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5200-7322
Ying Ling LinWorld Health Organization-WHO, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Maria Clara PadovezeSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo 05403-000, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1912-7293

Funding

CNPq call #18/2021, process 408.322 / 2021-7World Health Organization 456123789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of different types of personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs) and traditional N95 masks with face shields, on the physiological stress responses of healthcare workers (HWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilizing an interventional randomized crossover trial design, the research encompasses a simulation phase with ten participants followed by field testing involving thirty frontline healthcare professionals in a tertiary-care hospital setting. Heart rate (HR) and movement data were collected through smartwatches, while trained observers recorded the duration and nature of various activities undertaken during simulations. Data analysis employed statistical techniques, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE), to explore potential correlations between PPE type, HR, and movement. Clustering validation measures such as the Calinski-Harabasz, Davies-Bouldin, and Silhouette scores were applied to evaluate the difference between each type of PPE. The results indicated no significant differentiation in HR responses between the two PPE types. However, because HR may lack the sensitivity to fully capture variations in cognitive load or stress, these findings should be interpreted as an exploratory baseline. Additionally, no clear distinctions were observed regarding individual user responses or the activities performed, even when considering movement data. Although the findings imply non-inferiority of the examined PPE, future research including heart rate variability as a more comprehensive indicator of stress would be informative. This research contributes valuable insights into PPE selection and its implications for healthcare worker performance and well-being in high-stress environments, ultimately aiming to inform guidelines and training programs to enhance healthcare delivery during infectious disease outbreaks.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHeart RateN95 RespiratorsStress, PhysiologicalAdultCOVID-19Cross-Over StudiesFemaleFrontline WorkersHumansMaleMasksPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentRespiratory Protective Devicespersonal protective equipmentwearable health monitoringwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID42281047
PMCPMC13258937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.