ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Vision-Based Environmental Sensing for Flood Risk Forecasting: Dataset Relabeling and Temporal Multi-Task Learning.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
River flooding and urban inundation require forecasting systems that can anticipate future risk, rather than systems that only estimate the current water state. However, real-world closed-circuit television (CCTV)-based flood datasets often contain imbalanced or temporally inconsistent risk labels. In addition, most image-based approaches remain limited to static scene understanding. This study proposes a dataset reformulation and temporal multi-task forecasting framework for CCTV-based flood-risk prediction. First, we introduce a site-relative relabeling strategy that converts noisy frame-level danger annotations into four risk levels using visual flood indicators and lightweight environmental cues. Second, we transform the original frame-based dataset into site-hour sequences for multi-horizon forecasting at 1 h, 3 h, and 6 h. Third, we evaluate image-only, weather-only, and naive multimodal configurations to examine the role and limitations of heterogeneous sensor fusion. On the reformulated dataset, the image-only temporal model achieved the best overall performance, with a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.892, Dice score of 0.940, macro-averaged F1 score (Macro-F1) of 0.532, and high-risk recall of 0.642. In contrast, naive multimodal fusion reduced Macro-F1 to 0.267 and high-risk recall to 0.070. This result indicates that additional weather inputs do not automatically improve prediction when cross-modal signals are noisy, weakly correlated, or temporally misaligned. The ablation results further showed that removing temporal modeling decreased Macro-F1 to 0.227 and high-risk recall to 0.000. These findings demonstrate that dataset reformulation and temporal modeling are essential for extending CCTV-based flood analysis from static estimation to future risk forecasting. They also suggest that robust cross-modal alignment is required before multimodal sensing can provide reliable performance gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.