ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Automated Assessment of Manual Dexterity Using a Sensorized Nine-Hole Peg Test Board: Reproducibility and Innovative Quantitative Metrics.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) is widely used in clinical settings but typically relies on the assessor's expertise to record execution time. Here, we propose a novel sensorized 9-HPT capable of automatically measuring total execution time and, importantly, extracting a set of newly defined temporal parameters that enable a more detailed and objective characterization of task performance. We first demonstrated concurrent validity between the sensorized 9-HPT and stopwatch-based measurements recorded by an assessor (ρ always > 0.98;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.