ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Large-Scale Drift-Resilient Localization via Multi-Sensor Fusion and Topological Map Matching.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In large-scale road environments, constructing and maintaining high-precision maps is challenging, while GNSS-denied conditions exacerbate accumulated drift due to the lack of global references. Additionally, existing methods largely rely on LiDAR data but inadequately preprocess the data, which often leads to degraded accuracy and instability. To address these issues, this study proposes large-scale drift-resilient localization via multi-sensor fusion and topological map matching. The method leverages digital maps to extract topological road networks, eliminating the need for high-precision map construction. Accumulated drift is corrected by matching the odometry trajectory with the topological map, while localization accuracy and stability are further improved through precise ground point filtering and the integration of wheel odometry into a LiDAR-inertial odometry. Experiments on two campus datasets and KITTI 05 demonstrate the high accuracy and generalization of the proposed method in large-scale localization. Notably, on the longer School Dataset (3645 m), the mean error drops by 48.1% relative to LIO-SAM and 44.2% relative to FAST-LIO2. Repeated ablation trials further confirm the stability of the proposed method. These results demonstrate accurate and stable large-scale localization without high-precision prior maps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.