ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Contactless Respiratory Waveform Estimation Using a Depth Camera and AI-Based Body Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Estimation of Respiratory Volumes During Tidal Breathing Using Two Depth Cameras.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) examinations pose challenges for continuous patient observation, particularly when adverse events such as severe reactions to contrast media occur. To improve patient monitoring in such situations, this preliminary study proposes a contactless method for respiratory waveform estimation using a depth camera and AI-based body detection. The method identifies anatomically relevant respiratory regions and extracts depth-based motion signals while subjects are seated facing the camera, which is positioned approximately 2 m away. Performance was evaluated experimentally using a wearable force-sensor respiration belt as the reference. Quantitative assessment was conducted using waveform error metrics, Pearson correlation coefficients, respiratory-rate agreement, and Bland-Altman analysis, while qualitative analysis was used to examine the influence of clothing conditions on measurement performance. The results show that the proposed method can provide stable respiratory waveform estimation, with the chest region yielding the lowest waveform error and the highest correlation among the evaluated ROIs. Bland-Altman analysis further indicated small systematic errors in respiratory-rate estimation, although variability-related indices were affected by ROI selection and clothing conditions. These findings support the feasibility of the proposed approach for contactless respiratory monitoring during CT examinations and indicate that the main contribution of this study is to clarify the importance of anatomical ROI selection for robust waveform extraction under CT-oriented monitoring conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.