A Lightweight Real-Time Tomato Leaf Disease Detection System for Edge-Based Smart Agriculture.

Tomato leaf diseases substantially reduce tomato yields and quality and remain a persistent challenge for efficient crop management. Although deep learning-based detectors have achieved strong accuracy in controlled benchmarks, many existing solutions are still difficult to transfer to resource-constrained agricultural systems because they rely on high-end GPUs, consume considerable power, and often lose performance after deployment on embedded devices. To address this practical gap, this study proposes HGS-YOLO, a system-oriented deployable lightweight adaptation of YOLOv11 for leaf-level tomato disease detection, together with an end-to-end edge sensing pipeline for low-power agricultural deployment. The main contribution lies in the coordinated system-level co-design of model structure, optimization, and deployment rather than in a novel detector architecture. Specifically, YOLOv11 is adapted through three coordinated modifications: an HGNetV2 backbone for efficient feature extraction, an HS-FPN neck with channel attention for lightweight multi-scale fusion, and an MPDIoU loss function for more stable localization optimization. Beyond the model architecture, the study establishes a complete engineering pipeline that includes training, optimization, post-training quantization, and hardware deployment with BPU acceleration on a D-Robotics RDK X5 handheld platform. Comprehensive benchmark experiments indicate that HGS-YOLO achieves 93.6% mAP50 and 72.1% mAP@[0.5:0.95] with 86.5% recall, only 1.3 M parameters, and a 3.1 MB model size, substantially reducing the model complexity and storage cost relative to the YOLOv11 baseline. A three-seed retraining comparison shows that HGS-YOLO trades roughly 0.5 mAP50 points for this compactness (a statistically significant but small concession) and recovers the cost on the deployment side: on the RDK X5 chip, HGS-YOLO is the fastest, most memory-efficient, and lowest-power model among all compared detectors. Indoor deployment tests using separately collected tomato leaf samples further achieve 90.3% mAP50, 82.3% recall, 89.0% precision, 25.0 ± 0.4 ms end-to-end latency, 40.0 ± 0.6 FPS, and 9.8 ± 0.4 W average system power. After PTQ, the mAP50 drops from 93.6% to 93.0% on the same benchmark; because this figure was measured under controlled imaging conditions, it is presented as an in-distribution reference point rather than as evidence of robustness in the open field. We also took the handheld system into a working tomato greenhouse for a small outdoor field round, where it ran end-to-end and produced on-device disease detections under natural sunlight, specular highlights, partial occlusion, background clutter, and handheld motion blur. These results show that HGS-YOLO reaches a good balance of accuracy, efficiency, and deployability and that it works in the field on an independent small-scale test; validating it more widely across sites, seasons, and weather is left to future work.