ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Scenario-Driven Synthetic Data Generation Framework for Visual Perception Evaluation Under Adverse Driving Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing and evaluating visual perception systems for autonomous vehicles requires data across diverse and adverse driving conditions, yet collecting and annotating such real-world data is costly and often impractical. To address this challenge, we propose a modular, scenario-driven framework for generating synthetic datasets tailored to the evaluation of visual perception functions. The framework aligns with the operational boundaries and detection-response requirements of automated driving functions and comprises three stages: (1) configuring use-case-driven scenarios, (2) generating sensor data and ground truth via simulation, and (3) post-processing to ensure dataset usability. Designed to be generic and flexible, the framework is instantiated and demonstrated through its integration with specific platforms and tools, namely Pro-SiVIC and RTMaps. We evaluate the generated dataset from two perspectives, image fidelity and perception performance under synthetic weather conditions, in comparison to real-world conditions. Furthermore, we train multiple perception models under different learning paradigms, including baseline, transfer-learning, and mixed-training strategies, to examine the influence of synthetic data on robustness. Experimental results demonstrate not only the high quality of the generated data but also its effectiveness in evaluating visual perception functions, as well as its benefit to model robustness and generalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.