ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
River Surface Velocity and Discharge Estimation Using Optical Flow and Unlabeled Physics-Informed Neural Networks.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying river surface velocity and discharge is essential for flood control and mitigation. Traditional contact measurement methods are capable of providing precise results, yet they demand considerable manpower and material resources and face implementation challenges in flood seasons. Image velocimetry methods have attracted extensive attention due to their low cost, simplicity in operation, and safety. However, most of them lack a physical basis and interpretability. This paper introduces a river flow estimation algorithm combined with Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). The introduction of the convection-diffusion equation based on optical flow enables the model to better fit the flow characteristics of water and provides stronger physical support for the measurement results. The adoption of this equation as the loss function and the introduction of multiple scenarios eliminate the need for labeled data in the PINNs training process. The experimental results in both artificial and natural river channels demonstrate that the relative errors of the discharge measured by the proposed method are 0.66% and -1.75%, and the relative errors of the mean velocity are 0.64% and -2.33%. Compared with other methods, the proposed method exhibits superior performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.