ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Advances in Optimized and Safe Path Planning of Marine Autonomous Surface Vehicles: A Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of intelligent shipping and the autonomy of marine engineering equipment, numerous studies have focused on the advancement of Autonomous Surface Vehicles (ASVs). As a fundamental component of ASV automation systems, path planning directly determines the safety and economy of ship navigation. This paper systematically reviews recent research progress in ASV path planning. First, five key issues are identified for ASV path planning: navigation environment, environment modeling, ship motion model, collision avoidance for safety, and optimization. Second, existing algorithms are classified into four categories: graph search-based, sampling-based, numerical optimization-based, and artificial intelligence-based. The improvement directions and application scenarios of each category are elaborated. Finally, the four types of algorithms are evaluated against three indicators: path quality, scalability and extensibility, and algorithm performance. Analysis of the reviewed literature shows that traditional graph search and sampling algorithms perform well in various aspects under static environments, but are insufficient in adapting to multiple constraints and generalizing to different environments. In contrast, artificial intelligence algorithms represented by deep reinforcement learning exhibit significant advantages in dynamic collision avoidance decision-making, multi-agent coordination, and environmental generalization, and have become the mainstream direction of current research. This paper summarizes the existing challenges in safety and optimization in current ASV path planning research and prospects future development directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.