Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42280922›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Intrusion Detection in the Internet of Things: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Architectures, Datasets, and Emerging Trends.

Asma Komal, Shuaiyong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asma KomalSchool of Computer Science, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.ORCID 0009-0005-4229-1867
Shuaiyong LiKey Laboratory of Industrial Internet of Things and Networked Control, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3914-5173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the Internet of Things (IoT) grows, strong, scalable, and adaptive intrusion detection systems (IDS) become increasingly critical for protecting IoT environments. This paper presents a comprehensive and systematic survey of IDS techniques for IoT environments, covering literature from 2021 to early 2026. The review introduces a multidimensional taxonomy that categorizes IDS approaches by detection strategy, learning paradigm, deployment architecture, and evaluation methodology. We examine conventional techniques, such as signature-based and anomaly-based detection, as well as modern machine-learning and deep-learning approaches. Furthermore, emerging paradigms, including Federated Learning, Explainable AI (XAI), TinyML, Large Language Models (LLMs), Transformer, Quantum Machine Learning, Generative Adversarial Networks and Incremental Learning, are analyzed with respect to their applicability to resource-constrained IoT environments. The paper also provides a detailed analysis of publicly available IDS datasets, validation protocols, and evaluation metrics used for benchmarking detection systems. In addition, critical challenges, including dataset realism, adversarial robustness, scalability, privacy preservation, and ethical considerations, are discussed. Finally, we highlight open research directions and propose guidelines for designing next-generation, trustworthy, and scalable IDS frameworks for IoT networks.

Indexed as

adversarial attacksanomaly detectionbenchmark datasetscybersecuritydeep learning in IoTExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)federated learningInternet of Things (IoT)intrusion detection system (IDS)IoT securitylightweight IDSnetwork intrusionTinyMLvalidation strategies

Identifiers

PMID42280922
PMCPMC13259249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.