ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Physics-Grounded Multi-Modal Sensor Fusion Framework for Pedestrian Impact Kinematic Reconstruction Under Uncertainty: Phase 1 Design and Theoretical Evaluation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NUP-REPORT 1.0: A Proposed Reporting and Benchmarking Framework for Non-Upright Pedestrian Detection and Pre-Crash Safety Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pedestrian-vehicle collisions produce a rich kinematic record that is entirely lost by the time a forensic investigation begins. Recovering this record constitutes a state-estimation problem. This paper presents a Phase 1 design for a multimodal sensor fusion and signal-processing framework utilising 128-channel LiDAR, 1080p NIR stereo cameras, and a 2 kHz IMU, all fused via Kalman filtering and Savitzky-Golay polynomial differentiation. The framework is evaluated through Monte Carlo uncertainty propagation and sensitivity analysis applied to a constructed simulation scenario; no real clinical or forensic data are used in this Phase 1 report. Under simulated conditions with throw-distance measurement uncertainty of ±0.5 m, velocity reconstruction shows an estimated propagated uncertainty of ±2.03 km/h under expanded simulation conditions with vehicle-coefficient variance activated. Sensitivity analysis indicates that a 10% noise spike in acceleration would theoretically amplify injury metrics by 26.9%, providing quantitative justification for noise-optimal pre-filtering. The bimodal kinematic-acoustic architecture is proposed as a physically interpretable foundation for collision reconstruction; its experimental performance awaits Phase 2-4 validation. A five-phase validation roadmap is presented, progressing from FEA simulation to independent multi-site replication before any forensic deployment is proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.