ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Benchmarking Multilayer Perceptron Configurations for Damage Classification in UAV Composite Wings Using Fiber Bragg Gratings Sensors.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural damage classification in composite UAV wings is a key challenge in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), particularly under barely visible impact damage conditions. Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor networks provide high-resolution strain data; however, systematic experimental benchmarking of lightweight neural architectures trained on real FBG datasets remains limited, especially under sensor degradation scenarios. This work presents a four-phase benchmarking study of Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) configurations using strain measurements from a composite UAV wing instrumented with 32 FBG sensors across five damage states and 210 loading experiments. The framework evaluates optimization strategies, hyperparameter sensitivity, architectural depth, and robustness under controlled sensor dropout, Gaussian noise, and wavelength drift perturbations. Results indicate that compact architectures with progressive dimensional reduction (256-128-64) trained using adaptive optimizers (AdamW and Nadam) achieve the best balance between macro-F1 performance (up to 0.85 during validation), stability, and computational efficiency. Robustness analysis shows gradual performance degradation under sensor loss, suggesting distributed strain-field learning. These findings provide practical guidelines for selecting computationally efficient and robust neural models for deployable FBG-based SHM systems in aerospace applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.