ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
An Improved YOLOv8 Model for Pavement Distress Detection Under Low-Computing-Power Conditions.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated pavement distress detection (PDD) is critical for the structural health monitoring (SHM) of transportation infrastructure, yet existing methods struggle with real-time multi-target detection under resource constraints. In this paper, YOLOv8-PDD was constructed based on YOLOv8 by introducing the large separable kernel attention (LSKA) mechanism module into the Spatial Pyramid Pooling-Fast (SPPF) module, replacing Complete-IoU (CIoU) loss with Distance-IoU (DIOU) loss as the loss function, and adopting Soft-Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) to replace the original NMS algorithm. The proposed YOLOv8-PDD achieved 78.3% mean average precision with intersection over union above 0.5 (mAP@0.5 +8.1%) with a minimal complexity increase of +0.2 GFLOPs compared to the baseline YOLOv8n model. While incurring a negligible increase in latency (+0.09 ms), YOLOv8-PDD significantly outperforms YOLOv8n in detection accuracy (mAP@0.5 +8.1%), offering a superior accuracy-efficiency trade-off for real-time applications. YOLOv8-PDD performed well in detecting all categories, with AP values above 75% except for transverse crack and strip patch. Significant improvements in pothole detection AP@0.5 (+22.1%) and strip patch detection AP@0.5 (+17.7%) indicate superior small target and complex background adaptability. Our model achieved a detection efficiency of 68 frames per second (FPS) on consumer-grade CPUs (OpenVINO-optimized), outperforming 10 models (e.g., YOLOv5n and RTDETR-l) in accuracy-speed balance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.