ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Deep Learning Approach to Automatically Classify Ice Hockey Shooting Actions Using Acceleration Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In ice hockey, automatic activity detection using wearable sensors and machine learning could provide objective feedback to support coaches and players during performance evaluation. The primary objective was to assess the predictive ability of a deep learning model to recognize common ice hockey stick striking actions (passing, shooting) from inertial measurement unit sensors. This study implemented a fully connected convolutional neural network model to classify seven ice hockey-related technical actions (wrist shot, slap shot, backhand shot, one-timers, pass, other, and rest) using acceleration data via two setups: an all-sensor configuration (17 sensors) and a hands-only sensor configuration (2 sensors) in 43 elite players. Data were split into 80/20 train/test sets, with a five-fold cross-validation applied to the training data. The train/test split was repeated 10 times with different random splits to assess stability of results. The model achieved high classification accuracy, with the all-sensor model reaching an average F1 score of 95.0 ± 3.0% and the hands-only model achieving 93.5 ± 1.6%. These findings support the use of convolutional neural networks for automatic shooting action classification in ice hockey and highlight the feasibility of using minimal sensor configurations, such as sensor-integrated gloves, for real-world applications. This approach could further enhance training practices by providing objective performance metrics and allowing coaches to deliver data-driven feedback to players.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.