ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multimodal Biometric Framework for Evaluating Emotional Impact of Chromatic Manipulation in Cinematic Content.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how chromatic manipulation of cinematic content modulates emotional engagement, with specific attention to sex-differentiated responses. We used a mixed factorial design with chromatic condition as a within-subject factor and biological sex as a between-subject factor, counterbalanced across scenes through a 3 × 3 Latin square that renders scene identity orthogonal to chromatic condition by construction. Thirty adult viewers were recorded with synchronised facial-expression analysis (AFFDEX 5.1), blink detection, and galvanic skin response (Shimmer GSR). The primary inferential target was the Condition × Sex interaction on automated positive facial valence. This interaction was statistically reliable under three converging tests: a mixed-effects model (βMod×F=-4.48, SE=2.16, 95% CI [-8.81,-0.14], p=0.043), a participant-level cluster bootstrap (2000 resamples; 95% percentile CI [-9.78,-0.63]; pboot=0.011), and a label-permutation test. The effect was stable under leave-one-subject-out resampling (100% sign-stability) and persisted after introducing scene as a fixed factor. Blink rate and electrodermal activation showed directionally consistent but weaker interaction patterns. A multidimensional engagement framework that separates attentional-autonomic intensity from expressive valence supports interpretation of the finding as specific to expressive affective behavior rather than to overall activation. The results provide empirical evidence that chromatic manipulation in realistic cinematic stimuli modulates expressive affective responses in a sex-dependent manner, and they establish a reproducible multimodal biometric framework for chromatic impact assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.