ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Robust Multi-Branch CNN-LSTM Architecture for Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Classification.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) based on motor imagery (MI) aim to convert electroencephalographic (EEG) activity into reliable device commands across users and recording setups. However, low signal-to-noise ratio and strong inter-subject variability still limit true "plug-and-play" deployment without lengthy calibration. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-branch convolutional long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) architecture that jointly performs multi-scale temporal feature extraction and within-trial sequence modeling. The model employs four parallel 1D convolutional branches with distinct kernel sizes, each followed by an LSTM module and late fusion, combined with group normalization and supervision over sequences of sub-windows within each trial. We evaluate the approach on the EEG Motor Movement/Imagery (EEGMMI) dataset from PhysioNet under strictly subject-independent conditions, and on the ISLab-MI Dataset, a 32-channel wearable-EEG collection designed to assess cross-setup robustness. On EEGMMI, the network achieves up to 82.63% accuracy for binary left/right MI and 74.10% for a four-class task using 4 s trials under 5-fold cross-validation, outperforming an EEGNet-style baseline by 1-10% depending on class count and window length. Under a leave-one-subject-out protocol, the model attains 74.9% mean accuracy for a three-class MI task. Zero-shot transfer to ISLab-MI yields 64.60% and 63.02% accuracy in three- and four-class settings, respectively, while brief subject-specific fine-tuning using only 20% of each session improves performance to 81.38% and 73.48%. These findings show that combining multi-scale convolutional feature extraction with explicit sequence modeling and robust normalization yields accurate, data-efficient, and portable MI decoders suitable for practical BCI applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.