ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Non-Contact IOP Estimation Based on Corneal Stress Birefringence: Experimental and Computational Validation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment is essential for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Conventional contact tonometry (e.g., Goldmann and rebound devices) remains widely used, but its accuracy is affected by operator dependence, alignment errors, and patient discomfort. We present a non-contact IOP estimation framework based on corneal stress birefringence and full-field fringe inversion. Ex vivo porcine corneas were imaged under controlled pressure loading from 15 to 20 mmHg, and a coupled stress-optic/shell mechanics model was used to generate pressure-indexed synthetic fringe fields for inverse fitting. In the 15-18 mmHg range, more than 75% of the estimates were within plus or minus 1 mmHg of the reference pressure; performance declined at 19-20 mmHg, consistent with a stronger nonlinear biomechanical response and reduced fringe separability. Defect experiments further showed that local stiffness loss caused both near-defect distortion and far-field stress redistribution, supporting the need for full-field rather than point-wise analysis. These results indicate that stress-birefringence imaging is a promising route toward non-contact, region-sensitive IOP assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.