ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Gap Measurement Method for Railway Switch Machines Based on the Fusion of Deep Vision and Geometric Features.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gap dimension of a railway switch machine is a critical physical quantity for determining the locking status of railway turnouts. Under operating conditions characterized by heavy oil contamination, complex illumination, and equipment vibration, existing visual measurement methods often struggle to maintain stability and achieve sub-pixel precision. To address this issue, this paper proposes a gap measurement method based on the fusion of vision and geometric features (G-VFM). The method first utilizes a confidence-aware optimized YOLOv8 model to achieve robust localization of the gap region. Subsequently, an improved multi-channel U-Net is employed to extract soft-edge probability maps, based on which a 20-dimensional structured geometric descriptor is constructed. Finally, visual semantic features and geometric priors are fused for regression through an R34-Fusion two-stream residual network, and systematic errors are corrected using a weighted Huber loss combined with a piecewise linear calibration strategy. Test results on a constructed field dataset show that the proposed method achieves a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0076 mm and a maximum error of 0.0193 mm. It achieves a 100% pass rate under an industrial tolerance of 0.02 mm, with an end-to-end inference time of 52.23 ms (~19.15 FPS), balancing both precision and efficiency. Further tests on illumination degradation, noise interference, and cross-batch evaluations indicate that the method maintains relatively stable performance across various complex scenarios. However, performance decreases significantly under extremely low-light conditions, suggesting that actual deployment may require integration with active lighting or multi-sensor fusion to ensure system reliability across all working conditions. Overall, this method achieves high-precision gap measurement under current experimental conditions and provides a feasible solution for vision-based switch machine status monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.