ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Elevational Distribution Patterns and Driving Factors of Plant Carbon Storage Across Different Functional Groups in Subalpine Grasslands of the Eastern Loess Plateau, China.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subalpine grasslands (SGs) of the Loess Plateau in China play a crucial role in the global carbon cycle of terrestrial ecosystems. However, the distribution pattern of total carbon stores along an elevation gradient on the SG plants of the eastern plateau remains unclear. In this study, eight typical mountains with one well-developed SG being surveyed as plot for each mountain were selected along an elevation gradient from 1722 m to 2954 m on the east of the plateau. The vegetation area, hydrothermal factors, soil elements, and species composition were analyzed using methods of spatial analysis and a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM), and these were used to estimate the total carbon stores of different plant functional groups for the entire area of each SG. This study revealed the driving factors of the elevational pattern of plant carbon storage in the SGs. The entire plant carbon storage of the eight SGs was 35,880.98 Mg in total. In addition, the aboveground and belowground carbon storage values both exhibited U-shaped trends along the elevation gradient. Significant minimum values were observed at the mid-elevation regions, ranging from 2305 m to 2673 m. The plant carbon storage was predominantly allocated to the belowground portions (accounting for 72.3% of the total carbon storage), and this allocation strategy was more pronounced at both low- and high-elevation regions. The carbon storage proportion among the different plant functional groups was the largest for forbs (average in 2348.85 Mg, accounting for 52%), medium for sedges (average in 1982.81 Mg, accounting for 44%), and the smallest for grasses (average in 153.47 Mg, accounting for 4%). The plant species diversity promoted carbon accumulation in the sedges and forbs, while the soil total phosphorus exhibited an inhibitory effect. In the PLS-SEM, hydrothermal factors (total effect = -0.8107) and species diversity (total effect = 0.4969) were the primary drivers of the plant carbon storage elevational pattern in the SGs, while the soil properties (total effect = -0.3501) and biomass (total effect = 0.0697) effects did not reach statistical significances. Therefore, the plant carbon storage distribution pattern along the elevation gradient was driven by hydrothermal factors and species diversity on the SGs of the eastern plateau. The plants such as forbs and sedges might play more important roles in improving regional plant carbon storage in high-elevation grasslands, through interactions with hydrothermal factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.