Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42280631›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Micro- and Nanoplastics in Agricultural Crop Systems: From Environmental Particles to Plant Phenotypes and Food-System Relevance.

Muhammad Zubair, Abdul Karim, Maryam Noor, Laiba Bibi, Amina Qamar, Muhammad Ajmal Bashir, Muhammad Tanveer Akhtar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad ZubairCollege of Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Abdul KarimCollege of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Maryam NoorCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.
Laiba BibiDepartment of Botany, Centre for Plant Sciences and Biodiversity, University of Swat, Swat 19201, KP, Pakistan.
Amina QamarCollege of Forestry, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang 330045, China.
Muhammad Ajmal BashirDepartment of Agriculture and Forest Sciences (DAFNE), University of Tuscia, Via San Camillo De Lellis, s.n.c, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3556-4362
Muhammad Tanveer AkhtarCollege of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro- and nanoplastics (MPs/NPs) are increasingly recognized as persistent contaminants in agricultural systems, where repeated inputs from mulch films, biosolids, composts, irrigation water, and atmospheric deposition create sustained exposure pathways for crops. Although various studies report effects on crop growth and physiology, mechanistic interpretation remains limited because outcomes vary widely across experiments and are often discussed without appropriate attention to exposure context, particle properties, and evidentiary strength. This review advances an agroecosystem-centered, evidence-aware framework for interpreting how MPs/NPs influence crops from environmental entry to plant phenotype. We argue that crop responses cannot be inferred from polymer identity alone, but must be interpreted through the interacting effects of particle size, morphology, surface chemistry, weathering state, aggregation behavior, co-contaminant associations, and exposure matrix. Within this framework, crop responses are organized along a mechanistic chain linking environmental entry and plant contact, interface behavior at root and leaf surfaces, conditional barrier crossing and transport, ROS-centered stress signaling with hormonal and ionic regulation, and downstream effects on germination, root function, photosynthesis, biomass, productivity, and quality-related traits. Particular emphasis is placed on distinguishing surface association, supported internalization, and supported systemic translocation, because these categories carry distinct implications for edible-tissue occurrence, crop quality, and food-system relevance. Current evidence suggests that the soil-plant-food pathway is plausible and increasingly supported, but its interpretation remains constrained by uneven analytical rigor and limited field realism. Future progress will require realistic agricultural exposure designs, stronger polymer-specific confirmation, and closer integration of mechanistic evidence with agronomic and food-system endpoints.

Indexed as

agroecosystemscrop contaminationcrop qualityoxidative stressparticle uptakeplastic pollution

Identifiers

PMID42280631
PMCPMC13259466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.