ArticlePolymers2026
Methodological Insights from Low-Vacuum SEM for Morphological Analysis of Schwann Cells on Electrospun Scaffolds.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schwann cells (SCs) are critical effectors of peripheral nerve regeneration, and their interaction with biomaterial scaffolds is a key parameter in neural tissue engineering. This pilot study described and evaluated protocols for a morphological, quantitative, and morphometric analysis of SCs seeded on electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) scaffolds using variable-pressure scanning electron microscopy (VP-SEM) under a low vacuum, without a metal coating. Six protocols were compared, varying the number of seeded cells (50,000 or 100,000) and the method used to label the seeded face of the scaffold: no marking, graphite pencil, or permanent ink (Sharpie). Confocal microscopy confirmed SC viability and adhesion. The VP-SEM analysis revealed that seeding 100,000 cells significantly increased the number of detectable cells on the scaffold surface. Graphite labeling was associated with higher cell counts and a more stellate morphology, consistent with the biocompatibility of carbon-based materials reported in the literature. Conversely, ink labeling appeared to inhibit SC adhesion. A refined protocol for measuring SC extensions using ImageJ's ROI Manager and segmented line tools was also established. These findings provide practical methodological insights to improve the reliability and reproducibility of SC morphological analyses on ultra-thin polymeric scaffolds, with implications for peripheral nerve regeneration research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.