ReviewPolymers2026
Coconut Shell Aggregate and Coir Fiber in Cement Concrete: A Review of Mechanical Performance, Durability, and Sustainability Under Functional Equivalency.
Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural waste materials can serve as functional constituents in cement-based composites through three pathways: (i) organic bio-aggregates that lower density and alter thermal behavior, (ii) lignocellulosic fibers that control cracking and improve post-cracking resistance, and (iii) agro-ash supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) that densify pore structure and reduce permeability when ash quality and curing are controlled. This review draws on 98 papers, with coconut shell aggregate and coir/coconut fibers as the core focus; agro-ash SCMs (notably palm oil fuel ash, POFA, and rice husk ash, RHA) enter where they clarify mechanisms or inform hybrid design. Rather than cataloging compressive-strength data, the synthesis is organized around controllable process inputs (feedstock conditioning, mix design, curing) and the interface-governed mechanisms that determine performance: interfacial transition zone (ITZ) character and pore connectivity. In coconut shell systems, density reductions come at a cost: elastic modulus drops and moisture sensitivity rises unless shell conditioning, particle packing, and matrix refinement are managed. In fiber systems, gains in toughness and residual capacity are bounded by mixing workability and by the long-term stability of the fiber-matrix bond under alkaline and wet-dry exposure. A mix must first meet strength, serviceability, and transport requirements before its embodied impact is compared with conventional alternatives. The contribution is to reframe these systems around controllable processing and interface mechanisms instead of tabulated strength values; preparation, treatment, and characterization data are consolidated into bounded design windows, an explicit core versus supporting evidence convention is applied, and sustainability is judged under functional equivalency rather than per-volume carbon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.