ArticlePolymers2026
Synergistic Action of Corn, Wolf Fruit, and Butterfly Lily Starches in Bioactive Coatings and Their Potential Application in the Physiological Quality of Common Beans.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize corn (CS), wolf fruit (WF), and butterfly lily (BL) starches; to develop bioactive coatings from pure starches and their binary and ternary blends; and to evaluate the synergistic effects of these formulations on the physiological quality of common bean seeds. Films were prepared by thermocompression (80 °C, 6 min, 3 t) of film-forming solutions obtained via microwave processing and formulated using a simplex-centroid mixture design. The starches were characterized in terms of amylose content, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, Rapid Visco Analyser, while the films were evaluated for thickness, water solubility, and water vapor permeability. The film-forming solutions were applied as coatings, and seed physiological quality was assessed through germination, first count, seedling length, and dry mass. BL exhibited higher gelatinization temperatures and produced films with adequate thickness and moderate permeability, indicating greater structural stability. The CS:BL blend produced films with balanced hydration, promoting rapid and uniform water uptake. Coatings based on BL and CS:BL showed the highest germination percentages, whereas CS:WF resulted in lower physiological performance. These results demonstrate that film properties directly influence seed vigor and germination. BL, alone or blended with CS, represents a promising starch-based material for seed coating, promoting high physiological quality and environmentally friendly characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.