ArticlePolymers2026
Sustainable and High-Performance Food-Packaging Films from Poly(butylene 2,5-furanoate) and Poly(pentamethylene 2,5-furanoate) Blends.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Present research is focused on the preparation and characterization of bio-based polymer blends intended for sustainable food-packaging applications, starting from poly(butylene 2,5-furanoate) (PBF), characterized by very good barrier performance but quite high mechanical rigidity. In order to further improve gas permeability and increase its ductility, binary blends were prepared, combining PBF with varying amounts of poly(pentamethylene furanoate) (PPeF), another furan-based polyester with outstanding mechanical flexibility and gas barrier properties. The resulting materials were processed into compression-molded films and investigated through molecular, morphological, structural, thermal, and mechanical analyses. Blending turned out to be the winning tool in order to keep the high thermal stability of the reference homopolymers, increasing, at the same time, mechanical ductility and further lowering the permeability to oxygen and carbon dioxide compared to those measured for neat PBF. All these results were achieved without the use of any compatibilizer. Lastly, in order to test the end of life of these materials, composting studies were carried out, revealing a higher degree of weight loss for the blends compared with PBF homopolymer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.