ArticlePolymers2026
From Intrinsic Resin Properties to Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of CFRP: Crack-Tip Deformation, Transfer Mechanisms, and Loading-Mode Dependence.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interlaminar fracture toughness (ILFT) is a key factor governing the damage tolerance and service reliability of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates. This study aims to clarify how the deformation capability of epoxy resin affects the Mode I and Mode II ILFT of carbon fiber/epoxy laminates under comparable fiber, resin-content, and laminate-configuration conditions. Two epoxy systems were compared: a high-strength/high-modulus (HSHM) resin system, designated as Group B, and a high-toughness (HT) resin system, designated as Group T. Neat resin castings were characterized by tensile and flexural tests, and the corresponding CFRP laminates were evaluated using double cantilever beam (DCB) and end-notched flexure (ENF) tests. Although Group T showed slightly lower tensile strength and modulus than Group B, its elongation at break increased from 4.0% to 6.5%, corresponding to an increase of approximately 62.5%. The Mode I ILFT (GIC) increased from approximately 279 J/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.