ArticlePolymers2026
Evaluation of Biopolyurethane/Barley Straw-Based Engineered Wood Composites.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than 95% of building materials in Europe are produced from fossil raw materials. Over the past two decades, numerous scientific studies have demonstrated that building materials made from agricultural plants or industrial processing waste can compete with traditional materials. In this work, engineered wood composites were prepared from biopolyurethane and barley straw, and their properties were evaluated. Barley straw from bales was milled through sieves of different sizes. Four straw fractions of 5, 10, 25 and 35 mm were prepared for testing. During the research, the granulometric composition, particle density and shape of various fractions were evaluated. Engineered wood composites were prepared using different filler fractions and a biopolyurethane binder. In this study, engineered wood samples were produced using biopolyurethane binders at straw-to-binder ratios of 0.5 to 1.5. Different pressure levels were used for sample preparation: 1.5, 2.25 and 3.0 MPa. This study evaluated the influence of the granulometric composition and particle shape of straw on the properties of engineered wood composites. Tests showed that the highest compressive strength, 17.0 MPa, was achieved with composites formed from a 5 mm straw fraction, which had the highest density. The samples with the highest density were also characterised by the lowest swelling (5-10%) and water absorption (1-2%). The flammability of the samples showed that at a 0.5 binder/straw ratio, the composite was non-combustible and did not support flame spread after the flame source was removed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.