ArticlePolymers2026
Charge-Balanced Design for Redox-Responsive Disassembly of Ampholytic β-Sheet Peptide Nanofibers.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-assembling β-sheet-forming peptides are attractive building blocks for drug delivery nanomaterials. However, their strong intermolecular interactions often lead to high structural stability, which can hinder intracellular dissociation and limit cargo availability. Here, we propose a charge-compensated ampholytic design strategy for β-sheet peptide nanofibers that undergo destabilization and disassembly under reducing conditions. Six ampholytic peptides comprising an anionic main-chain peptide (β-sheet-forming motif, model antigenic cargo, and oligoglutamic acid segment) and a disulfide-linked cationic segment were designed and synthesized to vary the lengths and charges of the anionic and cationic segments, as well as the cationic insertion position. Four peptides formed nanofibers in 4×phosphate buffered saline (4×PBS) and the resulting nanofibers remained stable after dilution to 1×PBS, retaining β-sheet-rich secondary structures and fibrillar morphologies for at least 24 h. Under reducing conditions, the four preformed nanofibers exhibited distinct behaviors, including reduction-insensitive persistence, disassembly, and transient destabilization followed by re-stabilization, depending on peptide charge design. Redox-triggered disassembly was favored when the main-chain peptide had sufficient anionic character and the cationic segment was of moderate length and charge. This study therefore provides a molecular design strategy for controlling the destabilization of β-sheet peptide nanofibers under reducing conditions through disulfide-cleavage-induced disruption of charge compensation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.